selftests/x86: Style fixes for the 'unwind_vdso' test

Checkpatch is really quite bad for user code like this, but it caught two legit style issues. Reported-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> Cc: Brian Gerst <[email protected]> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/3335040bdd40d2bca4b1a28a3f8b165361c801b7.1444696194.git.luto@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
makiko-fly · Oct 14, 2015 · 893a3ec · 893a3ec
1 parent 374a3a3
commit 893a3ec
Showing 1 changed file with 4 additions and 2 deletions.
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/unwind_vdso.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/unwind_vdso.c
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ _Unwind_Reason_Code trace_fn(struct _Unwind_Context * ctx, void *opaque)
 
 static void sigtrap(int sig, siginfo_t *info, void *ctx_void)
 {
-	ucontext_t *ctx = (ucontext_t*)ctx_void;
+	ucontext_t *ctx = (ucontext_t *)ctx_void;
 	struct unwind_state state;
 	unsigned long ip = ctx->uc_mcontext.gregs[REG_EIP];
 
@@ -192,7 +192,9 @@ int main()
 		 * affected by libc/19006 (https://sourceware.org/PR19006).
 		 */
 		printf("[WARN]\tsyscall(2) didn't enter AT_SYSINFO\n");
-	} if (get_eflags() & X86_EFLAGS_TF) {
+	}
+
+	if (get_eflags() & X86_EFLAGS_TF) {
 		printf("[FAIL]\tTF is still set\n");
 		nerrs++;
 	}