erofs: remove WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE flag from unbound wq's

The documentation [1] says that WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE is "meaningless" for unbound wq. I remove this flag from places where unbound queue is allocated. This is supposed to improve code readability. [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/core-api/workqueue.html#flags Signed-off-by: Maksym Planeta <[email protected]> [Gao Xiang: since the original treewide patch [2] hasn't been merged yet, handling the EROFS part only for the next cycle. ] [2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <[email protected]>
marcan · Aug 3, 2020 · 0e62ea3 · 0e62ea3
1 parent ee4bf86
commit 0e62ea3
Showing 1 changed file with 2 additions and 2 deletions.
diff --git a/fs/erofs/zdata.c b/fs/erofs/zdata.c
@@ -43,13 +43,13 @@ void z_erofs_exit_zip_subsystem(void)
 static inline int z_erofs_init_workqueue(void)
 {
 	const unsigned int onlinecpus = num_possible_cpus();
-	const unsigned int flags = WQ_UNBOUND | WQ_HIGHPRI | WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE;
 
 	/*
 	 * no need to spawn too many threads, limiting threads could minimum
 	 * scheduling overhead, perhaps per-CPU threads should be better?
 	 */
-	z_erofs_workqueue = alloc_workqueue("erofs_unzipd", flags,
+	z_erofs_workqueue = alloc_workqueue("erofs_unzipd",
+					    WQ_UNBOUND | WQ_HIGHPRI,
 					    onlinecpus + onlinecpus / 4);
 	return z_erofs_workqueue ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
 }