Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

solution #4133

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

solution #4133

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

mmromanova
Copy link

No description provided.

Copy link

@mateacademy-ai-mentor mateacademy-ai-mentor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.


Hello! 😊 It looks like you're making great progress, but there are a few critical issues that need to be addressed before we can approve this pull request.

Key Issues to Address:

  1. Object Copy Placement: The newState2.push({ ...newState }); operation should be moved outside of the if-else block. This ensures that a copy of the object is pushed to the array at the end of each loop cycle, aligning with the task requirements.

  2. Switch Statement Usage: The task suggests using a switch statement for handling different action types instead of if-else statements. This can improve code readability and maintainability.

  3. Object Mutation: Avoid directly mutating objects. Instead, use the spread operator or Object.assign to create copies, which is a best practice for maintaining immutability.

  4. Naming Convention: Consider renaming newState2 to something more descriptive like stateHistory to better reflect its purpose.

By addressing these issues, your code will not only meet the task requirements but also adhere to best practices, making it more robust and easier to maintain. Keep up the great work, and I look forward to seeing your improvements! 🚀

✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨

🔄 Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button in the Reviewers tab.

Comment on lines 14 to 24
if (action.type === 'addProperties') {
newState = Object.assign(newState, action.extraData);
} else if (action.type === 'removeProperties') {
for (const key of action.keysToRemove) {
if (newState.hasOwnProperty(key)) {
delete newState[key];
}
}
} else if (action.type === 'clear') {
newState = {};
}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The current implementation places the newState2.push({ ...newState }); inside each condition block. According to the additional prompt rules, it is better to push a copy of the object to the array at the end of each loop cycle, but outside of the switch block, after the current action is processed. Consider moving the newState2.push({ ...newState }); line outside of the if-else block to ensure it executes after processing each action.

Copy link

@mateacademy-ai-mentor mateacademy-ai-mentor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great job on improving the code by using a switch statement and ensuring that a copy of the object is pushed to the array at the end of each loop cycle. Your solution meets the task requirements and constraints effectively. However, there are a few areas for improvement:

  • Object Mutation: While you are correctly using Object.assign, ensure that you are not mutating the original newState object. Consider creating a new object by using Object.assign({}, newState, action.extraData) to maintain immutability.

  • Default Case in Switch: Adding a default case in the switch statement would enhance error handling and align with best practices.

Overall, your code is well-structured and aligns with the task requirements. Keep up the good work, and make sure to address the mentioned issues to improve your code further. This decision is made to help you move forward with your learning journey. Remember to review the comments and learn from them to avoid similar issues in the future. 😊

✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨

for (const action of actions) {
switch (action.type) {
case 'addProperties':
newState = Object.assign(newState, action.extraData);

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

When using Object.assign, ensure that you are not mutating the original newState object. Consider creating a new object by using Object.assign({}, newState, action.extraData) to maintain immutability.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants