Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
virtio: don't always force a notification when ring is full
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
We force notification when the ring is full, even if the host has
indicated it doesn't want to know.  This seemed like a good idea at
the time: if we fill the transmit ring, we should tell the host
immediately.

Unfortunately this logic also applies to the receiving ring, which is
refilled constantly.  We should introduce real notification thesholds
to replace this logic.  Meanwhile, removing the logic altogether breaks
the heuristics which KVM uses, so we use a hack: only notify if there are
outgoing parts of the new buffer.

Here are the number of exits with lguest's crappy network implementation:
Before:
	network xmit 7859051 recv 236420
After:
	network xmit 7858610 recv 118136

Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
  • Loading branch information
rustyrussell committed Jul 25, 2008
1 parent 674bfc2 commit 44653ea
Showing 1 changed file with 5 additions and 2 deletions.
7 changes: 5 additions & 2 deletions drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -87,8 +87,11 @@ static int vring_add_buf(struct virtqueue *_vq,
if (vq->num_free < out + in) {
pr_debug("Can't add buf len %i - avail = %i\n",
out + in, vq->num_free);
/* We notify *even if* VRING_USED_F_NO_NOTIFY is set here. */
vq->notify(&vq->vq);
/* FIXME: for historical reasons, we force a notify here if
* there are outgoing parts to the buffer. Presumably the
* host should service the ring ASAP. */
if (out)
vq->notify(&vq->vq);
END_USE(vq);
return -ENOSPC;
}
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 44653ea

Please sign in to comment.