kernel-time: fix s/then/than/ spelling errors

Use than for comparisons, like more than.

CC: John Stultz <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jim Cromie <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <[email protected]>

kernel/time/clocksource.c

@@ -500,7 +500,7 @@ static u32 clocksource_max_adjustment(struct clocksource *cs)
 {
 	u64 ret;
 	/*
-	 * We won't try to correct for more then 11% adjustments (110,000 ppm),
+	 * We won't try to correct for more than 11% adjustments (110,000 ppm),
 	 */
 	ret = (u64)cs->mult * 11;
 	do_div(ret,100);

kernel/time/timekeeping.c

@@ -822,23 +822,23 @@ static void timekeeping_adjust(s64 offset)
 	int adj;
 
 	/*
-	 * The point of this is to check if the error is greater then half
+	 * The point of this is to check if the error is greater than half
 	 * an interval.
 	 *
 	 * First we shift it down from NTP_SHIFT to clocksource->shifted nsecs.
 	 *
 	 * Note we subtract one in the shift, so that error is really error*2.
 	 * This "saves" dividing(shifting) interval twice, but keeps the
 	 * (error > interval) comparison as still measuring if error is
-	 * larger then half an interval.
+	 * larger than half an interval.
 	 *
 	 * Note: It does not "save" on aggravation when reading the code.
 	 */
 	error = timekeeper.ntp_error >> (timekeeper.ntp_error_shift - 1);
 	if (error > interval) {
 		/*
 		 * We now divide error by 4(via shift), which checks if
-		 * the error is greater then twice the interval.
+		 * the error is greater than twice the interval.
 		 * If it is greater, we need a bigadjust, if its smaller,
 		 * we can adjust by 1.
 		 */
@@ -949,7 +949,7 @@ static cycle_t logarithmic_accumulation(cycle_t offset, int shift)
 	u64 nsecps = (u64)NSEC_PER_SEC << timekeeper.shift;
 	u64 raw_nsecs;
 
-	/* If the offset is smaller then a shifted interval, do nothing */
+	/* If the offset is smaller than a shifted interval, do nothing */
 	if (offset < timekeeper.cycle_interval<<shift)
 		return offset;
 
@@ -1017,13 +1017,13 @@ static void update_wall_time(void)
 	 * With NO_HZ we may have to accumulate many cycle_intervals
 	 * (think "ticks") worth of time at once. To do this efficiently,
 	 * we calculate the largest doubling multiple of cycle_intervals
-	 * that is smaller then the offset. We then accumulate that
+	 * that is smaller than the offset.  We then accumulate that
 	 * chunk in one go, and then try to consume the next smaller
 	 * doubled multiple.
 	 */
 	shift = ilog2(offset) - ilog2(timekeeper.cycle_interval);
 	shift = max(0, shift);
-	/* Bound shift to one less then what overflows tick_length */
+	/* Bound shift to one less than what overflows tick_length */
 	maxshift = (64 - (ilog2(ntp_tick_length())+1)) - 1;
 	shift = min(shift, maxshift);
 	while (offset >= timekeeper.cycle_interval) {
@@ -1071,7 +1071,7 @@ static void update_wall_time(void)
 
 	/*
 	 * Finally, make sure that after the rounding
-	 * xtime.tv_nsec isn't larger then NSEC_PER_SEC
+	 * xtime.tv_nsec isn't larger than NSEC_PER_SEC
 	 */
 	if (unlikely(timekeeper.xtime.tv_nsec >= NSEC_PER_SEC)) {
 		int leap;