Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Merge tag 'v4.12-rc1' into fixes
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history 
We've received a few fixes branches with -rc1 as base, but our contents was
still at pre-rc1. Merge it in expliticly to make 'git merge --log' clear on
hat was actually merged.

Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <[email protected]>
  • Loading branch information
@olofj
olofj committed May 19, 2017
2 parents e841888 + 2ea659a commit 5252d73
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 1,469 changed files with 42,142 additions and 31,581 deletions.
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions .gitignore
View file
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
*.lzo
*.patch
*.gcno
*.ll
modules.builtin
Module.symvers
*.dwo
Expand Down
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions .mailmap
View file
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -146,6 +146,8 @@ Santosh Shilimkar <[email protected]>
Santosh Shilimkar <[email protected]>
Sascha Hauer <[email protected]>
S.Çağlar Onur <[email protected]>
Sebastian Reichel <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Sebastian Reichel <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Shiraz Hashim <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Shuah Khan <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Shuah Khan <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion Documentation/RCU/00-INDEX
View file
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ rcu_dereference.txt
rcubarrier.txt
- RCU and Unloadable Modules
rculist_nulls.txt
- RCU list primitives for use with SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU
- RCU list primitives for use with SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU
rcuref.txt
- Reference-count design for elements of lists/arrays protected by RCU
rcu.txt
Expand Down
233 changes: 169 additions & 64 deletions Documentation/RCU/Design/Data-Structures/Data-Structures.html
View file
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ <h3>Introduction</h3>
The <tt>rcu_state</tt> Structure</a>
<li> <a href="#The rcu_node Structure">
The <tt>rcu_node</tt> Structure</a>
<li> <a href="#The rcu_segcblist Structure">
The <tt>rcu_segcblist</tt> Structure</a>
<li> <a href="#The rcu_data Structure">
The <tt>rcu_data</tt> Structure</a>
<li> <a href="#The rcu_dynticks Structure">
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -841,6 +843,134 @@ <h5>Sizing the <tt>rcu_node</tt> Array</h5>
Finally, lines&nbsp;64-66 produce an error if the maximum number of
CPUs is too large for the specified fanout.

<h3><a name="The rcu_segcblist Structure">
The <tt>rcu_segcblist</tt> Structure</a></h3>

The <tt>rcu_segcblist</tt> structure maintains a segmented list of
callbacks as follows:

<pre>
1 #define RCU_DONE_TAIL 0
2 #define RCU_WAIT_TAIL 1
3 #define RCU_NEXT_READY_TAIL 2
4 #define RCU_NEXT_TAIL 3
5 #define RCU_CBLIST_NSEGS 4
6
7 struct rcu_segcblist {
8 struct rcu_head *head;
9 struct rcu_head **tails[RCU_CBLIST_NSEGS];
10 unsigned long gp_seq[RCU_CBLIST_NSEGS];
11 long len;
12 long len_lazy;
13 };
</pre>

<p>
The segments are as follows:

<ol>
<li> <tt>RCU_DONE_TAIL</tt>: Callbacks whose grace periods have elapsed.
These callbacks are ready to be invoked.
<li> <tt>RCU_WAIT_TAIL</tt>: Callbacks that are waiting for the
current grace period.
Note that different CPUs can have different ideas about which
grace period is current, hence the <tt>-&gt;gp_seq</tt> field.
<li> <tt>RCU_NEXT_READY_TAIL</tt>: Callbacks waiting for the next
grace period to start.
<li> <tt>RCU_NEXT_TAIL</tt>: Callbacks that have not yet been
associated with a grace period.
</ol>

<p>
The <tt>-&gt;head</tt> pointer references the first callback or
is <tt>NULL</tt> if the list contains no callbacks (which is
<i>not</i> the same as being empty).
Each element of the <tt>-&gt;tails[]</tt> array references the
<tt>-&gt;next</tt> pointer of the last callback in the corresponding
segment of the list, or the list's <tt>-&gt;head</tt> pointer if
that segment and all previous segments are empty.
If the corresponding segment is empty but some previous segment is
not empty, then the array element is identical to its predecessor.
Older callbacks are closer to the head of the list, and new callbacks
are added at the tail.
This relationship between the <tt>-&gt;head</tt> pointer, the
<tt>-&gt;tails[]</tt> array, and the callbacks is shown in this
diagram:

</p><p><img src="nxtlist.svg" alt="nxtlist.svg" width="40%">

</p><p>In this figure, the <tt>-&gt;head</tt> pointer references the
first
RCU callback in the list.
The <tt>-&gt;tails[RCU_DONE_TAIL]</tt> array element references
the <tt>-&gt;head</tt> pointer itself, indicating that none
of the callbacks is ready to invoke.
The <tt>-&gt;tails[RCU_WAIT_TAIL]</tt> array element references callback
CB&nbsp;2's <tt>-&gt;next</tt> pointer, which indicates that
CB&nbsp;1 and CB&nbsp;2 are both waiting on the current grace period,
give or take possible disagreements about exactly which grace period
is the current one.
The <tt>-&gt;tails[RCU_NEXT_READY_TAIL]</tt> array element
references the same RCU callback that <tt>-&gt;tails[RCU_WAIT_TAIL]</tt>
does, which indicates that there are no callbacks waiting on the next
RCU grace period.
The <tt>-&gt;tails[RCU_NEXT_TAIL]</tt> array element references
CB&nbsp;4's <tt>-&gt;next</tt> pointer, indicating that all the
remaining RCU callbacks have not yet been assigned to an RCU grace
period.
Note that the <tt>-&gt;tails[RCU_NEXT_TAIL]</tt> array element
always references the last RCU callback's <tt>-&gt;next</tt> pointer
unless the callback list is empty, in which case it references
the <tt>-&gt;head</tt> pointer.

<p>
There is one additional important special case for the
<tt>-&gt;tails[RCU_NEXT_TAIL]</tt> array element: It can be <tt>NULL</tt>
when this list is <i>disabled</i>.
Lists are disabled when the corresponding CPU is offline or when
the corresponding CPU's callbacks are offloaded to a kthread,
both of which are described elsewhere.

</p><p>CPUs advance their callbacks from the
<tt>RCU_NEXT_TAIL</tt> to the <tt>RCU_NEXT_READY_TAIL</tt> to the
<tt>RCU_WAIT_TAIL</tt> to the <tt>RCU_DONE_TAIL</tt> list segments
as grace periods advance.

</p><p>The <tt>-&gt;gp_seq[]</tt> array records grace-period
numbers corresponding to the list segments.
This is what allows different CPUs to have different ideas as to
which is the current grace period while still avoiding premature
invocation of their callbacks.
In particular, this allows CPUs that go idle for extended periods
to determine which of their callbacks are ready to be invoked after
reawakening.

</p><p>The <tt>-&gt;len</tt> counter contains the number of
callbacks in <tt>-&gt;head</tt>, and the
<tt>-&gt;len_lazy</tt> contains the number of those callbacks that
are known to only free memory, and whose invocation can therefore
be safely deferred.

<p><b>Important note</b>: It is the <tt>-&gt;len</tt> field that
determines whether or not there are callbacks associated with
this <tt>rcu_segcblist</tt> structure, <i>not</i> the <tt>-&gt;head</tt>
pointer.
The reason for this is that all the ready-to-invoke callbacks
(that is, those in the <tt>RCU_DONE_TAIL</tt> segment) are extracted
all at once at callback-invocation time.
If callback invocation must be postponed, for example, because a
high-priority process just woke up on this CPU, then the remaining
callbacks are placed back on the <tt>RCU_DONE_TAIL</tt> segment.
Either way, the <tt>-&gt;len</tt> and <tt>-&gt;len_lazy</tt> counts
are adjusted after the corresponding callbacks have been invoked, and so
again it is the <tt>-&gt;len</tt> count that accurately reflects whether
or not there are callbacks associated with this <tt>rcu_segcblist</tt>
structure.
Of course, off-CPU sampling of the <tt>-&gt;len</tt> count requires
the use of appropriate synchronization, for example, memory barriers.
This synchronization can be a bit subtle, particularly in the case
of <tt>rcu_barrier()</tt>.

<h3><a name="The rcu_data Structure">
The <tt>rcu_data</tt> Structure</a></h3>

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -983,62 +1113,18 @@ <h5>RCU Callback Handling</h5>
as follows:

<pre>
1 struct rcu_head *nxtlist;
2 struct rcu_head **nxttail[RCU_NEXT_SIZE];
3 unsigned long nxtcompleted[RCU_NEXT_SIZE];
4 long qlen_lazy;
5 long qlen;
6 long qlen_last_fqs_check;
1 struct rcu_segcblist cblist;
2 long qlen_last_fqs_check;
3 unsigned long n_cbs_invoked;
4 unsigned long n_nocbs_invoked;
5 unsigned long n_cbs_orphaned;
6 unsigned long n_cbs_adopted;
7 unsigned long n_force_qs_snap;
8 unsigned long n_cbs_invoked;
9 unsigned long n_cbs_orphaned;
10 unsigned long n_cbs_adopted;
11 long blimit;
8 long blimit;
</pre>

<p>The <tt>-&gt;nxtlist</tt> pointer and the
<tt>-&gt;nxttail[]</tt> array form a four-segment list with
older callbacks near the head and newer ones near the tail.
Each segment contains callbacks with the corresponding relationship
to the current grace period.
The pointer out of the end of each of the four segments is referenced
by the element of the <tt>-&gt;nxttail[]</tt> array indexed by
<tt>RCU_DONE_TAIL</tt> (for callbacks handled by a prior grace period),
<tt>RCU_WAIT_TAIL</tt> (for callbacks waiting on the current grace period),
<tt>RCU_NEXT_READY_TAIL</tt> (for callbacks that will wait on the next
grace period), and
<tt>RCU_NEXT_TAIL</tt> (for callbacks that are not yet associated
with a specific grace period)
respectively, as shown in the following figure.

</p><p><img src="nxtlist.svg" alt="nxtlist.svg" width="40%">

</p><p>In this figure, the <tt>-&gt;nxtlist</tt> pointer references the
first
RCU callback in the list.
The <tt>-&gt;nxttail[RCU_DONE_TAIL]</tt> array element references
the <tt>-&gt;nxtlist</tt> pointer itself, indicating that none
of the callbacks is ready to invoke.
The <tt>-&gt;nxttail[RCU_WAIT_TAIL]</tt> array element references callback
CB&nbsp;2's <tt>-&gt;next</tt> pointer, which indicates that
CB&nbsp;1 and CB&nbsp;2 are both waiting on the current grace period.
The <tt>-&gt;nxttail[RCU_NEXT_READY_TAIL]</tt> array element
references the same RCU callback that <tt>-&gt;nxttail[RCU_WAIT_TAIL]</tt>
does, which indicates that there are no callbacks waiting on the next
RCU grace period.
The <tt>-&gt;nxttail[RCU_NEXT_TAIL]</tt> array element references
CB&nbsp;4's <tt>-&gt;next</tt> pointer, indicating that all the
remaining RCU callbacks have not yet been assigned to an RCU grace
period.
Note that the <tt>-&gt;nxttail[RCU_NEXT_TAIL]</tt> array element
always references the last RCU callback's <tt>-&gt;next</tt> pointer
unless the callback list is empty, in which case it references
the <tt>-&gt;nxtlist</tt> pointer.

</p><p>CPUs advance their callbacks from the
<tt>RCU_NEXT_TAIL</tt> to the <tt>RCU_NEXT_READY_TAIL</tt> to the
<tt>RCU_WAIT_TAIL</tt> to the <tt>RCU_DONE_TAIL</tt> list segments
as grace periods advance.
<p>The <tt>-&gt;cblist</tt> structure is the segmented callback list
described earlier.
The CPU advances the callbacks in its <tt>rcu_data</tt> structure
whenever it notices that another RCU grace period has completed.
The CPU detects the completion of an RCU grace period by noticing
Expand All @@ -1049,16 +1135,7 @@ <h5>RCU Callback Handling</h5>
<tt>-&gt;completed</tt> field is updated at the end of each
grace period.

</p><p>The <tt>-&gt;nxtcompleted[]</tt> array records grace-period
numbers corresponding to the list segments.
This allows CPUs that go idle for extended periods to determine
which of their callbacks are ready to be invoked after reawakening.

</p><p>The <tt>-&gt;qlen</tt> counter contains the number of
callbacks in <tt>-&gt;nxtlist</tt>, and the
<tt>-&gt;qlen_lazy</tt> contains the number of those callbacks that
are known to only free memory, and whose invocation can therefore
be safely deferred.
<p>
The <tt>-&gt;qlen_last_fqs_check</tt> and
<tt>-&gt;n_force_qs_snap</tt> coordinate the forcing of quiescent
states from <tt>call_rcu()</tt> and friends when callback
Expand All @@ -1069,6 +1146,10 @@ <h5>RCU Callback Handling</h5>
fields count the number of callbacks invoked,
sent to other CPUs when this CPU goes offline,
and received from other CPUs when those other CPUs go offline.
The <tt>-&gt;n_nocbs_invoked</tt> is used when the CPU's callbacks
are offloaded to a kthread.

<p>
Finally, the <tt>-&gt;blimit</tt> counter is the maximum number of
RCU callbacks that may be invoked at a given time.

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1104,6 +1185,9 @@ <h3><a name="The rcu_dynticks Structure">
1 int dynticks_nesting;
2 int dynticks_nmi_nesting;
3 atomic_t dynticks;
4 bool rcu_need_heavy_qs;
5 unsigned long rcu_qs_ctr;
6 bool rcu_urgent_qs;
</pre>

<p>The <tt>-&gt;dynticks_nesting</tt> field counts the
Expand All @@ -1117,11 +1201,32 @@ <h3><a name="The rcu_dynticks Structure">
field, except that NMIs that interrupt non-dyntick-idle execution
are not counted.

</p><p>Finally, the <tt>-&gt;dynticks</tt> field counts the corresponding
</p><p>The <tt>-&gt;dynticks</tt> field counts the corresponding
CPU's transitions to and from dyntick-idle mode, so that this counter
has an even value when the CPU is in dyntick-idle mode and an odd
value otherwise.

</p><p>The <tt>-&gt;rcu_need_heavy_qs</tt> field is used
to record the fact that the RCU core code would really like to
see a quiescent state from the corresponding CPU, so much so that
it is willing to call for heavy-weight dyntick-counter operations.
This flag is checked by RCU's context-switch and <tt>cond_resched()</tt>
code, which provide a momentary idle sojourn in response.

</p><p>The <tt>-&gt;rcu_qs_ctr</tt> field is used to record
quiescent states from <tt>cond_resched()</tt>.
Because <tt>cond_resched()</tt> can execute quite frequently, this
must be quite lightweight, as in a non-atomic increment of this
per-CPU field.

</p><p>Finally, the <tt>-&gt;rcu_urgent_qs</tt> field is used to record
the fact that the RCU core code would really like to see a quiescent
state from the corresponding CPU, with the various other fields indicating
just how badly RCU wants this quiescent state.
This flag is checked by RCU's context-switch and <tt>cond_resched()</tt>
code, which, if nothing else, non-atomically increment <tt>-&gt;rcu_qs_ctr</tt>
in response.

<table>
<tr><th>&nbsp;</th></tr>
<tr><th align="left">Quick Quiz:</th></tr>
Expand Down
Loading

0 comments on commit 5252d73

Please sign in to comment.