Editorial changes #646
Merged
Editorial changes #646
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ianswett
approved these changes
Jan 16, 2025
ianswett
added
the
Editorial
Co-authored-by: ianswett <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: ianswett <[email protected]>
gloinul
requested review from
kixelated,
suhasHere and
vasilvv
as code owners
martinduke
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 30, 2025
This reverts commit 7578d11.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
More stuff from #643. This is purely editorial IMO.