Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider deferred bundleization at first storage service #108

Open
jphickey opened this issue Jun 9, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Consider deferred bundleization at first storage service #108

jphickey opened this issue Jun 9, 2022 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@jphickey
Copy link
Collaborator

jphickey commented Jun 9, 2022

Currently the input data is turned into a bundle at the time the application calls "bplib_send", and the bundle is temporarily stored in memory. This bundle is then routed to a storage service for retention, which offloads it to some form of persistent storage (at least after #90 is implemented).

This basically entails making two copies, first into temporary storage then into the persistent storage. This could potentially be reduced, if the bundleization step was deferred until it arrived at storage (or at least the payload was sent as a pointer rather than a copy), then it could be only a single copy directly into persistent storage.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant