riscv, bpf: Optimize BPF tail calls

Remove one addi, and instead use the offset part of jalr. Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
nawuyao · Dec 19, 2019 · fe8322b · fe8322b
1 parent 33203c0
commit fe8322b
Showing 1 changed file with 7 additions and 6 deletions.
diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -552,7 +552,7 @@ static int epilogue_offset(struct rv_jit_context *ctx)
 	return (to - from) << 2;
 }
 
-static void __build_epilogue(u8 reg, struct rv_jit_context *ctx)
+static void __build_epilogue(bool is_tail_call, struct rv_jit_context *ctx)
 {
 	int stack_adjust = ctx->stack_size, store_offset = stack_adjust - 8;
 
@@ -589,9 +589,11 @@ static void __build_epilogue(u8 reg, struct rv_jit_context *ctx)
 
 	emit(rv_addi(RV_REG_SP, RV_REG_SP, stack_adjust), ctx);
 	/* Set return value. */
-	if (reg == RV_REG_RA)
+	if (!is_tail_call)
 		emit(rv_addi(RV_REG_A0, RV_REG_A5, 0), ctx);
-	emit(rv_jalr(RV_REG_ZERO, reg, 0), ctx);
+	emit(rv_jalr(RV_REG_ZERO, is_tail_call ? RV_REG_T3 : RV_REG_RA,
+		     is_tail_call ? 4 : 0), /* skip TCC init */
+	     ctx);
 }
 
 /* return -1 or inverted cond */
@@ -751,9 +753,8 @@ static int emit_bpf_tail_call(int insn, struct rv_jit_context *ctx)
 	if (is_12b_check(off, insn))
 		return -1;
 	emit(rv_ld(RV_REG_T3, off, RV_REG_T2), ctx);
-	emit(rv_addi(RV_REG_T3, RV_REG_T3, 4), ctx);
 	emit(rv_addi(RV_REG_TCC, RV_REG_T1, 0), ctx);
-	__build_epilogue(RV_REG_T3, ctx);
+	__build_epilogue(true, ctx);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -1504,7 +1505,7 @@ static void build_prologue(struct rv_jit_context *ctx)
 
 static void build_epilogue(struct rv_jit_context *ctx)
 {
-	__build_epilogue(RV_REG_RA, ctx);
+	__build_epilogue(false, ctx);
 }
 
 static int build_body(struct rv_jit_context *ctx, bool extra_pass)