seccomp: fix kernel-doc function name warning

Move the ACTION_ONLY() macro so that it is not between the kernel-doc notation and the function definition for seccomp_run_filters(), eliminating a kernel-doc warning: kernel/seccomp.c:400: warning: expecting prototype for seccomp_run_filters(). Prototype was for ACTION_ONLY() instead Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]> Cc: Kees Cook <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Will Drewry <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
niw · Jan 14, 2023 · 0fb0624 · 0fb0624
1 parent 88603b6
commit 0fb0624
Showing 1 changed file with 1 addition and 1 deletion.
diff --git a/kernel/seccomp.c b/kernel/seccomp.c
@@ -388,6 +388,7 @@ static inline bool seccomp_cache_check_allow(const struct seccomp_filter *sfilte
 }
 #endif /* SECCOMP_ARCH_NATIVE */
 
+#define ACTION_ONLY(ret) ((s32)((ret) & (SECCOMP_RET_ACTION_FULL)))
 /**
  * seccomp_run_filters - evaluates all seccomp filters against @sd
  * @sd: optional seccomp data to be passed to filters
@@ -397,7 +398,6 @@ static inline bool seccomp_cache_check_allow(const struct seccomp_filter *sfilte
  *
  * Returns valid seccomp BPF response codes.
  */
-#define ACTION_ONLY(ret) ((s32)((ret) & (SECCOMP_RET_ACTION_FULL)))
 static u32 seccomp_run_filters(const struct seccomp_data *sd,
 			       struct seccomp_filter **match)
 {