Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
netlink: add NLA_REJECT policy type
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
In some situations some netlink attributes may be used for output
only (kernel->userspace) or may be reserved for future use. It's
then helpful to be able to prevent userspace from using them in
messages sent to the kernel, since they'd otherwise be ignored and
any future will become impossible if this happens.

Add NLA_REJECT to the policy which does nothing but reject (with
EINVAL) validation of any messages containing this attribute.
Allow for returning a specific extended ACK error message in the
validation_data pointer.

While at it clear up the documentation a bit - the NLA_BITFIELD32
documentation was added to the list of len field descriptions.

Also, use NL_SET_BAD_ATTR() in one place where it's open-coded.

The specific case I have in mind now is a shared nested attribute
containing request/response data, and it would be pointless and
potentially confusing to have userspace include response data in
the messages that actually contain a request.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
  • Loading branch information
jmberg-intel authored and davem330 committed Sep 19, 2018
1 parent 89f4b9a commit 568b742
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 2 changed files with 28 additions and 8 deletions.
13 changes: 12 additions & 1 deletion include/net/netlink.h
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -180,6 +180,7 @@ enum {
NLA_S32,
NLA_S64,
NLA_BITFIELD32,
NLA_REJECT,
__NLA_TYPE_MAX,
};

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -208,9 +209,19 @@ enum {
* NLA_MSECS Leaving the length field zero will verify the
* given type fits, using it verifies minimum length
* just like "All other"
* NLA_BITFIELD32 A 32-bit bitmap/bitselector attribute
* NLA_BITFIELD32 Unused
* NLA_REJECT Unused
* All other Minimum length of attribute payload
*
* Meaning of `validation_data' field:
* NLA_BITFIELD32 This is a 32-bit bitmap/bitselector attribute and
* validation data must point to a u32 value of valid
* flags
* NLA_REJECT This attribute is always rejected and validation data
* may point to a string to report as the error instead
* of the generic one in extended ACK.
* All other Unused
*
* Example:
* static const struct nla_policy my_policy[ATTR_MAX+1] = {
* [ATTR_FOO] = { .type = NLA_U16 },
Expand Down
23 changes: 16 additions & 7 deletions lib/nlattr.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -69,7 +69,8 @@ static int validate_nla_bitfield32(const struct nlattr *nla,
}

static int validate_nla(const struct nlattr *nla, int maxtype,
const struct nla_policy *policy)
const struct nla_policy *policy,
const char **error_msg)
{
const struct nla_policy *pt;
int minlen = 0, attrlen = nla_len(nla), type = nla_type(nla);
Expand All @@ -87,6 +88,11 @@ static int validate_nla(const struct nlattr *nla, int maxtype,
}

switch (pt->type) {
case NLA_REJECT:
if (pt->validation_data && error_msg)
*error_msg = pt->validation_data;
return -EINVAL;

case NLA_FLAG:
if (attrlen > 0)
return -ERANGE;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -180,11 +186,10 @@ int nla_validate(const struct nlattr *head, int len, int maxtype,
int rem;

nla_for_each_attr(nla, head, len, rem) {
int err = validate_nla(nla, maxtype, policy);
int err = validate_nla(nla, maxtype, policy, NULL);

if (err < 0) {
if (extack)
extack->bad_attr = nla;
NL_SET_BAD_ATTR(extack, nla);
return err;
}
}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -250,11 +255,15 @@ int nla_parse(struct nlattr **tb, int maxtype, const struct nlattr *head,
u16 type = nla_type(nla);

if (type > 0 && type <= maxtype) {
static const char _msg[] = "Attribute failed policy validation";
const char *msg = _msg;

if (policy) {
err = validate_nla(nla, maxtype, policy);
err = validate_nla(nla, maxtype, policy, &msg);
if (err < 0) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR(extack, nla,
"Attribute failed policy validation");
NL_SET_BAD_ATTR(extack, nla);
if (extack)
extack->_msg = msg;
goto errout;
}
}
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 568b742

Please sign in to comment.