mm/vmalloc: fix show vmap_area information race with vmap_area tear down

There is a race window between vmap_area tear down and show vmap_area
information.

	A                                                B

remove_vm_area
spin_lock(&vmap_area_lock);
va->vm = NULL;
va->flags &= ~VM_VM_AREA;
spin_unlock(&vmap_area_lock);
						spin_lock(&vmap_area_lock);
						if (va->flags & (VM_LAZY_FREE | VM_LAZY_FREEZING))
							return 0;
						if (!(va->flags & VM_VM_AREA)) {
							seq_printf(m, "0x%pK-0x%pK %7ld vm_map_ram\n",
								(void *)va->va_start, (void *)va->va_end,
								va->va_end - va->va_start);
							return 0;
						}
free_unmap_vmap_area(va);
	flush_cache_vunmap
	free_unmap_vmap_area_noflush
		unmap_vmap_area
		free_vmap_area_noflush
			va->flags |= VM_LAZY_FREE

The assumption !VM_VM_AREA represents vm_map_ram allocation is
introduced by d4033af ("mm, vmalloc: iterate vmap_area_list,
instead of vmlist, in vmallocinfo()").

However, !VM_VM_AREA also represents vmap_area is being tear down in
race window mentioned above.  This patch fix it by don't dump any
information for !VM_VM_AREA case and also remove (VM_LAZY_FREE |
VM_LAZY_FREEING) check since they are not possible for !VM_VM_AREA case.

Suggested-by: Joonsoo Kim <[email protected]>
Acked-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <[email protected]>
Cc: Mitsuo Hayasaka <[email protected]>
Cc: Zhang Yanfei <[email protected]>
Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

mm/vmalloc.c

@@ -2578,15 +2578,12 @@ static int s_show(struct seq_file *m, void *p)
 	struct vmap_area *va = p;
 	struct vm_struct *v;
 
-	if (va->flags & (VM_LAZY_FREE | VM_LAZY_FREEING))
-		return 0;
-
-	if (!(va->flags & VM_VM_AREA)) {
-		seq_printf(m, "0x%pK-0x%pK %7ld vm_map_ram\n",
-			(void *)va->va_start, (void *)va->va_end,
-					va->va_end - va->va_start);
+	/*
+	 * s_show can encounter race with remove_vm_area, !VM_VM_AREA on
+	 * behalf of vmap area is being tear down or vm_map_ram allocation.
+	 */
+	if (!(va->flags & VM_VM_AREA))
 		return 0;
-	}
 
 	v = va->vm;