Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
ipc/sem.c: sem preempt improve
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
The strange sysv semaphore wakeup scheme has a kind of busy-wait lock
involved, which could deadlock if preemption is enabled during the "lock".

It is an implementation detail (due to a spinlock being held) that this is
actually the case.  However if "spinlocks" are made preemptible, or if the
sem lock is changed to a sleeping lock for example, then the wakeup would
become buggy.  So this might be a bugfix for -rt kernels.

Imagine waker being preempted by wakee and never clearing IN_WAKEUP -- if
wakee has higher RT priority then there is a priority inversion deadlock.
Even if there is not a priority inversion to cause a deadlock, then there
is still time wasted spinning.

Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Manfred Spraul <[email protected]>
Cc: Pierre Peiffer <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Loading branch information
Nick Piggin authored and torvalds committed Dec 16, 2009
1 parent 9cad200 commit d421209
Showing 1 changed file with 23 additions and 15 deletions.
38 changes: 23 additions & 15 deletions ipc/sem.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -398,6 +398,27 @@ static int try_atomic_semop (struct sem_array * sma, struct sembuf * sops,
return result;
}

/*
* Wake up a process waiting on the sem queue with a given error.
* The queue is invalid (may not be accessed) after the function returns.
*/
static void wake_up_sem_queue(struct sem_queue *q, int error)
{
/*
* Hold preempt off so that we don't get preempted and have the
* wakee busy-wait until we're scheduled back on. We're holding
* locks here so it may not strictly be needed, however if the
* locks become preemptible then this prevents such a problem.
*/
preempt_disable();
q->status = IN_WAKEUP;
wake_up_process(q->sleeper);
/* hands-off: q can disappear immediately after writing q->status. */
smp_wmb();
q->status = error;
preempt_enable();
}

/* Go through the pending queue for the indicated semaphore
* looking for tasks that can be completed.
*/
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -429,17 +450,7 @@ static void update_queue (struct sem_array * sma)
* continue.
*/
alter = q->alter;

/* wake up the waiting thread */
q->status = IN_WAKEUP;

wake_up_process(q->sleeper);
/* hands-off: q will disappear immediately after
* writing q->status.
*/
smp_wmb();
q->status = error;

wake_up_sem_queue(q, error);
if (alter)
goto again;
}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -523,10 +534,7 @@ static void freeary(struct ipc_namespace *ns, struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp)
list_for_each_entry_safe(q, tq, &sma->sem_pending, list) {
list_del(&q->list);

q->status = IN_WAKEUP;
wake_up_process(q->sleeper); /* doesn't sleep */
smp_wmb();
q->status = -EIDRM; /* hands-off q */
wake_up_sem_queue(q, -EIDRM);
}

/* Remove the semaphore set from the IDR */
Expand Down

0 comments on commit d421209

Please sign in to comment.