Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reset IO for the multiple iters output accurancy #9412

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

billmguo
Copy link
Contributor

Summary:
if I don't reset_io same as shiftpointer, the multi-iters send output will be incorrect
Example for error

<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>

what is 1+1<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>

1 + 1 = 1 + 1 = 2<|eot_id|><|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>

what is 1+1<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>

briefly!

after the below diff

<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>

what is 1+1<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>

1 + 1 = 1 + 1 = 2<|eot_id|><|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>

what is 1+1<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>

1 + 1 = 1 + 1 = 2<|eot_id|><|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>

Differential Revision: D71492510

Summary:
if I don't reset_io same as shiftpointer, the multi-iters send output will be incorrect
Example for error

<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>

what is 1+1<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>

1 + 1 = 1 + 1 = 2<|eot_id|><|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>

what is 1+1<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>

 briefly!

after the below diff

<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>

what is 1+1<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>

1 + 1 = 1 + 1 = 2<|eot_id|><|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>

what is 1+1<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>

1 + 1 = 1 + 1 = 2<|eot_id|><|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>

Differential Revision: D71492510
@billmguo billmguo requested a review from cccclai as a code owner March 19, 2025 20:34
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Mar 19, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/9412

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit d2d24c3 with merge base e0235f0 (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Mar 19, 2025
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D71492510

@billmguo
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot label "topic: not user facing"

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. fb-exported topic: not user facing
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants