forked from dotnet/machinelearning
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Simple IDataView implementation sample. (dotnet#3302)
- Loading branch information
Showing
3 changed files
with
262 additions
and
0 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
254 changes: 254 additions & 0 deletions
254
docs/samples/Microsoft.ML.Samples/Dynamic/SimpleDataViewImplementation.cs
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,254 @@ | ||
using System; | ||
using System.Collections.Generic; | ||
using System.Linq; | ||
using Microsoft.ML; | ||
using Microsoft.ML.Data; | ||
|
||
namespace Samples.Dynamic | ||
{ | ||
/// <summary> | ||
/// The <see cref="IDataView"/> interface is the central concept of "data" in ML.NET. While many conveniences exist | ||
/// to create pre-baked implementations, it is also useful to know how to create one completely from scratch. We also | ||
/// take this opportunity to illustrate and motivate the basic principles of how the IDataView system is architected, | ||
/// since people interested in implementing <see cref="IDataView"/> need at least some knowledge of those principles. | ||
/// </summary> | ||
public static class SimpleDataViewImplementation | ||
{ | ||
public static void Example() | ||
{ | ||
// First we create an array of these objects, which we "present" as this IDataView implementation so that it | ||
// can be used in a simple ML.NET pipeline. | ||
var inputArray = new[] | ||
{ | ||
new InputObject(false, "Hello my friend."), | ||
new InputObject(true, "Stay awhile and listen."), | ||
new InputObject(true, "Masterfully done hero!") | ||
}; | ||
var dataView = new InputObjectDataView(inputArray); | ||
|
||
// So, this is a very simple pipeline: a transformer that tokenizes Text, does nothing with the Label column | ||
// at all. | ||
var mlContext = new MLContext(); | ||
var transformedDataView = mlContext.Transforms.Text.TokenizeIntoWords( | ||
"TokenizedText", "Text").Fit(dataView).Transform(dataView); | ||
|
||
var textColumn = transformedDataView.Schema["Text"]; | ||
var tokensColumn = transformedDataView.Schema["TokenizedText"]; | ||
|
||
using (var cursor = transformedDataView.GetRowCursor(new[] { textColumn, tokensColumn })) | ||
{ | ||
// Note that it is best to get the getters and values *before* iteration, so as to faciliate buffer | ||
// sharing (if applicable), and column-type validation once, rather than many times. | ||
ReadOnlyMemory<char> textValue = default; | ||
VBuffer<ReadOnlyMemory<char>> tokensValue = default; | ||
|
||
var textGetter = cursor.GetGetter<ReadOnlyMemory<char>>(textColumn); | ||
var tokensGetter = cursor.GetGetter<VBuffer<ReadOnlyMemory<char>>>(tokensColumn); | ||
|
||
while (cursor.MoveNext()) | ||
{ | ||
textGetter(ref textValue); | ||
tokensGetter(ref tokensValue); | ||
|
||
Console.WriteLine($"{textValue} => {string.Join(", ", tokensValue.DenseValues())}"); | ||
} | ||
|
||
// The output to console is this: | ||
|
||
// Hello my friend. => Hello, my, friend. | ||
// Stay awhile and listen. => Stay, awhile, and, listen. | ||
// Masterfully done hero! => Masterfully, done, hero! | ||
|
||
// Note that it may be interesting to set a breakpoint on the Console.WriteLine, and explore | ||
// what is going on with the cursor, and the buffers. In particular, on the third iteration, | ||
// while `tokensValue` is logically presented as a three element array, internally you will | ||
// see that the arrays internal to that structure have (at least) four items, specifically: | ||
// `Masterfully`, `done`, `hero!`, `listen.`. In this way we see a simple example of the details | ||
// of how buffer sharing from one iteration to the next actually works. | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
private sealed class InputObject | ||
{ | ||
public bool Label { get; } | ||
public string Text { get; } | ||
|
||
public InputObject(bool label, string text) | ||
{ | ||
Label = label; | ||
Text = text; | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
/// <summary> | ||
/// This is an implementation of <see cref="IDataView"/> that wraps an <see cref="IEnumerable{T}"/> | ||
/// of the above <see cref="InputObject"/>. Note that normally under these circumstances, the first | ||
/// recommendation would be to use a convenience like | ||
/// <see cref="DataOperationsCatalog.LoadFromEnumerable{TRow}(IEnumerable{TRow}, SchemaDefinition)"/> | ||
/// or something like that, rather than implementing <see cref="IDataView"/> outright. However, sometimes when | ||
/// code generation is impossible on some situations, like Unity or other similar platforms, implementing | ||
/// something even closely resembling this may become necessary. | ||
/// | ||
/// This implementation of <see cref="IDataView"/>, being didactic, is much simpler than practically | ||
/// anything one would find in the ML.NET codebase. In this case we have a completely fixed schema (the two | ||
/// fields of <see cref="InputObject"/>), with fixed types. | ||
/// | ||
/// For <see cref="Schema"/>, note that we keep a very simple schema based off the members of the object. You | ||
/// may in fact note that it is possible in this specific case, this implementation of | ||
/// <see cref="IDatView"/> could share the same <see cref="DataViewSchema"/> object across all instances of this | ||
/// object, but since this is almost never the case, I do not take advantage of that. | ||
/// | ||
/// We have chosen to wrap an <see cref="IEnumerable{T}"/>, so in fact only a very simple implementation is | ||
/// possible. Specifically: we cannot meaningfully shuffle (so <see cref="CanShuffle"/> is | ||
/// <see langword="false"/>, and even if a <see cref="Random"/> parameter were passed to | ||
/// <see cref="GetRowCursor(IEnumerable{DataViewSchema.Column}, Random)"/>, we could not make use of it), we do | ||
/// not know the count of the item right away without counting (so, it is most correct for | ||
/// <see cref="GetRowCount"/> to return <see langword="null"/>, even after we might hypothetically know after | ||
/// the first pass, given the immutability principle of <see cref="IDatView"/>), and the | ||
/// <see cref="GetRowCursorSet(IEnumerable{DataViewSchema.Column}, int, Random)"/> method returns a single item. | ||
/// | ||
/// The <see cref="DataViewRowCursor"/> derived class has more documentation specific to its behavior. | ||
/// | ||
/// Note that this implementation, as well as the nested <see cref="DataViewRowCursor"/> derived class, does | ||
/// almost no validation of parameters or guard against misuse than we would like from, say, implementations of | ||
/// the same classes within the ML.NET codebase. | ||
/// </summary> | ||
private sealed class InputObjectDataView : IDataView | ||
{ | ||
private readonly IEnumerable<InputObject> _data; | ||
public DataViewSchema Schema { get; } | ||
public bool CanShuffle => false; | ||
|
||
public InputObjectDataView(IEnumerable<InputObject> data) | ||
{ | ||
_data = data; | ||
|
||
var builder = new DataViewSchema.Builder(); | ||
builder.AddColumn("Label", BooleanDataViewType.Instance); | ||
builder.AddColumn("Text", TextDataViewType.Instance); | ||
Schema = builder.ToSchema(); | ||
} | ||
|
||
public long? GetRowCount() => null; | ||
|
||
public DataViewRowCursor GetRowCursor(IEnumerable<DataViewSchema.Column> columnsNeeded, Random rand = null) | ||
=> new Cursor(this, columnsNeeded.Any(c => c.Index == 0), columnsNeeded.Any(c => c.Index == 1)); | ||
|
||
public DataViewRowCursor[] GetRowCursorSet(IEnumerable<DataViewSchema.Column> columnsNeeded, int n, Random rand = null) | ||
=> new[] { GetRowCursor(columnsNeeded, rand) }; | ||
|
||
/// <summary> | ||
/// Having this be a private sealed nested class follows the typical pattern: in most | ||
/// <see cref="IDataView"/> implementations, the cursor instance is almost always that. The only "common" | ||
/// exceptions to this tendency are those implementations that are such thin wrappings of existing | ||
/// <see cref="IDataView"/> without even bothering to change the schema. | ||
/// | ||
/// On the subject of schema, note that there is an expectation that the <see cref="Schema"/> object is | ||
/// reference equal to the <see cref="IDataView.Schema"/> object that created this cursor, as we see here. | ||
/// | ||
/// Note that <see cref="Batch"/> returns <c>0</c>. As described in the documentation of that property, that | ||
/// is meant to facilitate the reconciliation of the partitioning of the data in the case where multiple | ||
/// cursors are returned from | ||
/// <see cref="GetRowCursorSet(IEnumerable{DataViewSchema.Column}, int, Random)"/>, but since only one is | ||
/// ever returned from the implementation, this behavior is appropriate. | ||
/// | ||
/// Similarly, since it is impossible to have a shuffled cursor or a cursor set, it is sufficient for the | ||
/// <see cref="GetIdGetter"/> implementation to return a simple ID based on the position. If, however, this | ||
/// had been something built on, hypothetically, an <see cref="IList{T}"/> or some other such structure, and | ||
/// shuffling and partitioning was available, an ID based on the index of whatever item was being returned | ||
/// would be appropriate. | ||
/// | ||
/// Note the usage of the <see langword="ref"/> parameters on the <see cref="ValueGetter{TValue}"/> | ||
/// implementations. This is most valuable in the case of buffer sharing for <see cref="VBuffer{T}"/>, but | ||
/// we still of course have to deal with it here. | ||
/// | ||
/// Note also that we spend a considerable amount of effort to not make the | ||
/// <see cref="GetGetter{TValue}(DataViewSchema.Column)"/> and | ||
/// <see cref="IsColumnActive(DataViewSchema.Column)"/> methods correctly reflect what was asked for from | ||
/// the <see cref="GetRowCursor(IEnumerable{DataViewSchema.Column}, Random)"/> | ||
/// method that was used to create this method. In this particular case, the point is somewhat moot: this | ||
/// mechanism exists to enable lazy evaluation, but since this cursor is implemented to wrap an | ||
/// <see cref="IEnumerator{T}"/> which has no concept of lazy evaluation, there is no real practical benefit | ||
/// to doing this. However, it is best of course to illustrate the general principle for the sake of the | ||
/// example. | ||
/// | ||
/// Even in this simple form, we see the reason why <see cref="GetGetter{TValue}(DataViewSchema.Column)"/> | ||
/// is beneficial: the <see cref="ValueGetter{TValue}"/> implementations themselves are simple to the point | ||
/// where their operation is dwarfed by the simple acts of casting and validation checking one sees in | ||
/// <see cref="GetGetter{TValue}(DataViewSchema.Column)"/>. In this way we only pay the cost of validation | ||
/// and casting once, not every time we get a value. | ||
/// </summary> | ||
private sealed class Cursor : DataViewRowCursor | ||
{ | ||
private bool _disposed; | ||
private long _position; | ||
private readonly IEnumerator<InputObject> _enumerator; | ||
private readonly Delegate[] _getters; | ||
|
||
public override long Position => _position; | ||
public override long Batch => 0; | ||
public override DataViewSchema Schema { get; } | ||
|
||
public Cursor(InputObjectDataView parent, bool wantsLabel, bool wantsText) | ||
{ | ||
Schema = parent.Schema; | ||
_position = -1; | ||
_enumerator = parent._data.GetEnumerator(); | ||
_getters = new Delegate[] | ||
{ | ||
wantsLabel ? (ValueGetter<bool>)LabelGetterImplementation : null, | ||
wantsText ? (ValueGetter<ReadOnlyMemory<char>>)TextGetterImplementation : null | ||
}; | ||
} | ||
|
||
protected override void Dispose(bool disposing) | ||
{ | ||
if (_disposed) | ||
return; | ||
if (disposing) | ||
{ | ||
_enumerator.Dispose(); | ||
_position = -1; | ||
} | ||
_disposed = true; | ||
base.Dispose(disposing); | ||
} | ||
|
||
private void LabelGetterImplementation(ref bool value) | ||
=> value = _enumerator.Current.Label; | ||
|
||
private void TextGetterImplementation(ref ReadOnlyMemory<char> value) | ||
=> value = _enumerator.Current.Text.AsMemory(); | ||
|
||
private void IdGetterImplementation(ref DataViewRowId id) | ||
=> id = new DataViewRowId((ulong)_position, 0); | ||
|
||
public override ValueGetter<TValue> GetGetter<TValue>(DataViewSchema.Column column) | ||
{ | ||
if (!IsColumnActive(column)) | ||
throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException(nameof(column)); | ||
return (ValueGetter<TValue>)_getters[column.Index]; | ||
} | ||
|
||
public override ValueGetter<DataViewRowId> GetIdGetter() | ||
=> IdGetterImplementation; | ||
|
||
public override bool IsColumnActive(DataViewSchema.Column column) | ||
=> _getters[column.Index] != null; | ||
|
||
public override bool MoveNext() | ||
{ | ||
if (_disposed) | ||
return false; | ||
if (_enumerator.MoveNext()) | ||
{ | ||
_position++; | ||
return true; | ||
} | ||
Dispose(); | ||
return false; | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters