fix the softlockup watchdog to actually work

this Xen related commit: commit 966812d Author: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]> Date: Tue May 8 00:28:02 2007 -0700 Ignore stolen time in the softlockup watchdog broke the softlockup watchdog to never report any lockups. (!) print_timestamp defaults to 0, this makes the following condition always true: if (print_timestamp < (touch_timestamp + 1) || and we'll in essence never report soft lockups. apparently the functionality of the soft lockup watchdog was never actually tested with that patch applied ... Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
redpig · Oct 17, 2007 · a115d5c · a115d5c
1 parent a3b13c2
commit a115d5c
Showing 1 changed file with 4 additions and 3 deletions.
diff --git a/kernel/softlockup.c b/kernel/softlockup.c
@@ -82,10 +82,11 @@ void softlockup_tick(void)
 	print_timestamp = per_cpu(print_timestamp, this_cpu);
 
 	/* report at most once a second */
-	if (print_timestamp < (touch_timestamp + 1) ||
-		did_panic ||
-			!per_cpu(watchdog_task, this_cpu))
+	if ((print_timestamp >= touch_timestamp &&
+			print_timestamp < (touch_timestamp + 1)) ||
+			did_panic || !per_cpu(watchdog_task, this_cpu)) {
 		return;
+	}
 
 	/* do not print during early bootup: */
 	if (unlikely(system_state != SYSTEM_RUNNING)) {