Fix PTRACE_INTERRUPT to actually work if the tracee is not already stopped. #3923
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The current code is completely untested because it will always call syscall_state.emulate_result twice and fatally assert. The ptrace_seize test does not yield between PTRACE_CONT and PTRACE_INTERRUPT, so rr will not switch to the emulated ptracee and resume execution, and the PTRACE_INTERRUPT will always find the emulated ptracee already stopped. Additionally, the test does not wait on the emulated ptracee again after interrupting it, so the following assertion about the value of status is bogus.
Fix all of that by adding the appropriate waitpid, tweaking the status assertion, duplicating the PTRACE_CONT/PTRACE_INTERRUPT sequence but with an intervening sched_yield() to force the emulated ptracee to resume, and fixing rr's PTRACE_INTERRUPT emulation to emulate_result only once and to place an emulated stop on the emulated ptracee.