fs/ramfs: don't use module_init for non-modular core code

The ramfs is always built in.  It will never be modular, so using
module_init as an alias for __initcall is rather misleading.

Fix this up now, so that we can relocate module_init from init.h into
module.h in the future.  If we don't do this, we'd have to add module.h
to obviously non-modular code, and that would be a worse thing.

Note that direct use of __initcall is discouraged, vs.  one of the
priority categorized subgroups.  As __initcall gets mapped onto
device_initcall, our use of fs_initcall (which makes sense for fs code)
will thus change this registration from level 6-device to level 5-fs
(i.e. slightly earlier).  However no observable impact of that small
difference has been observed during testing, or is expected.

Also note that this change uncovers a missing semicolon bug in the
registration of the initcall.

Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

fs/ramfs/inode.c

@@ -275,4 +275,4 @@ int __init init_ramfs_fs(void)
 
 	return err;
 }
-module_init(init_ramfs_fs)
+fs_initcall(init_ramfs_fs);