Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix header rules #1770

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 1, 2025
Merged

Fix header rules #1770

merged 2 commits into from
Apr 1, 2025

Conversation

ehuss
Copy link
Contributor

@ehuss ehuss commented Mar 27, 2025

This fixes some inadvertent changes from #1710 where some of the rules aren't positioned correctly relative to their header, and some extra blank lines were added.

ehuss added 2 commits March 27, 2025 09:08
Some of these were missed in
rust-lang#1710 or were inadvertently
merged after that PR.
Most of these snuck in with rust-lang#1710.
As part of the style guide, there shouldn't be double blank lines.
@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: The marked PR is awaiting review from a maintainer label Mar 27, 2025
@traviscross traviscross added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 1, 2025
Merged via the queue into rust-lang:master with commit 96618fa Apr 1, 2025
5 checks passed
Zalathar added a commit to Zalathar/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2025
Update books

## rust-lang/reference

12 commits in e95ebdfee02514d93f79ec92ae310a804e87f01f..46435cd4eba11b66acaa42c01da5c80ad88aee4b
2025-04-07 14:21:21 UTC to 2025-03-25 20:13:17 UTC

- Update book.toml fix the authors field (rust-lang/reference#1780)
- Update precedence table for borrow operators (rust-lang/reference#1776)
- Add the ability for rules to be specified in link definitions (rust-lang/reference#1775)
- Rework trait parameter patterns (rust-lang/reference#1771)
- Fix header rules (rust-lang/reference#1770)
- Add test wrappers (rust-lang/reference#1774)
- Update tools to Rust 2024 (rust-lang/reference#1773)
- Define byte (rust-lang/reference#1772)
- Fix CSS for new footnote style (rust-lang/reference#1777)
- do not reference LLVM in our definition of UB (rust-lang/reference#1750)
- Tweak reference for precise capturing in traits (rust-lang/reference#1769)
- Add edition admonitions (rust-lang/reference#1764)

## rust-lang/rust-by-example

2 commits in 6f69823c28ae8d929d6c815181c73d3e99ef16d3..0d7964d5b22cf920237ef1282d869564b4883b88
2025-04-07 11:19:31 UTC to 2025-03-29 02:25:52 UTC

- Rename count to index for clarity (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1920)
- Fixing grammar in panic section (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1916)
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2025
Update books

## rust-lang/reference

12 commits in e95ebdfee02514d93f79ec92ae310a804e87f01f..46435cd4eba11b66acaa42c01da5c80ad88aee4b
2025-04-07 14:21:21 UTC to 2025-03-25 20:13:17 UTC

- Update book.toml fix the authors field (rust-lang/reference#1780)
- Update precedence table for borrow operators (rust-lang/reference#1776)
- Add the ability for rules to be specified in link definitions (rust-lang/reference#1775)
- Rework trait parameter patterns (rust-lang/reference#1771)
- Fix header rules (rust-lang/reference#1770)
- Add test wrappers (rust-lang/reference#1774)
- Update tools to Rust 2024 (rust-lang/reference#1773)
- Define byte (rust-lang/reference#1772)
- Fix CSS for new footnote style (rust-lang/reference#1777)
- do not reference LLVM in our definition of UB (rust-lang/reference#1750)
- Tweak reference for precise capturing in traits (rust-lang/reference#1769)
- Add edition admonitions (rust-lang/reference#1764)

## rust-lang/rust-by-example

2 commits in 6f69823c28ae8d929d6c815181c73d3e99ef16d3..0d7964d5b22cf920237ef1282d869564b4883b88
2025-04-07 11:19:31 UTC to 2025-03-29 02:25:52 UTC

- Rename count to index for clarity (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1920)
- Fixing grammar in panic section (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1916)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: The marked PR is awaiting review from a maintainer
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants