Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
block: kill extra rcu lock/unlock in queue enter
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
blk_try_enter_queue() already takes rcu_read_lock/unlock, so we can
avoid the second pair in percpu_ref_tryget_live(), use a newly added
percpu_ref_tryget_live_rcu().

As rcu_read_lock/unlock imply barrier()s, it's pretty noticeable,
especially for for !CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU (default for some distributions),
where __rcu_read_lock/unlock() are not inlined.

3.20%  io_uring  [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] __rcu_read_unlock
3.05%  io_uring  [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] __rcu_read_lock

2.52%  io_uring  [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] __rcu_read_unlock
2.28%  io_uring  [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] __rcu_read_lock

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/6b11c67ea495ed9d44f067622d852de4a510ce65.1634822969.git.asml.silence@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
  • Loading branch information
isilence authored and axboe committed Oct 21, 2021
1 parent 3b13c16 commit e94f685
Showing 1 changed file with 1 addition and 1 deletion.
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion block/blk-core.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_cleanup_queue);
static bool blk_try_enter_queue(struct request_queue *q, bool pm)
{
rcu_read_lock();
if (!percpu_ref_tryget_live(&q->q_usage_counter))
if (!percpu_ref_tryget_live_rcu(&q->q_usage_counter))
goto fail;

/*
Expand Down

0 comments on commit e94f685

Please sign in to comment.