[action] [PR:21775] [chassis-packet] Allow Fallback Route to get programmed on Downstream LC #21833
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What/Why I did:
Initially I made the change that Fallback Route [routes from AH on Upstream LC] not to get programmed [mark them as deny] on Downstream LC's as reasoning was that on Downstream LC's can forward them based on Default-route. However that assumption is correct for example we have topology like this:
RH is connected to ASIC0 of Upstream LC
AH is connected to ASIC1 of Upstream LC
Downstream LC will learn route from RH [including default-route] and will only forward to ASIC0 of upstream LC . Above assumption was fine if we always have AH and RH connected to same ASIC of Upstream LC.
How I verify:
UT updated
Manual Verification.