Caterwaul is two different things. First, and most importantly, it is a powerful low-level Javascript code manipulation library with a Javascript parser, AST, in-process compiler, and replication. Second, it is a programming language implementation that uses this library to transform your code in various arcane ways that I happen to find useful.
The whole project is MIT-licensed, and in the unlikely event that you want to use it you are free to email me with any questions/issues.
What follows is a ten-minute introduction to caterwaul's core concepts. It covers about 5% of what caterwaul does.
It has a few defects. One relates to stuff like if (x) switch (y) {} else z();
, which gets rewritten to broken code. This is a parse-level problem and I haven't had time to fix it yet.
Second, various ES5/6 features aren't entirely supported; for example functions-in-objects (let x = {f() {}};
). There's probably more; the ES5 support was hacked on last-minute.
Third, Caterwaul parses non-JS. let @x = 100
is fine, let x\y\z = @foo[\]
works, etc. Not a defect exactly, but something to be aware of.
Caterwaul is implemented in pure Javascript, so you can use it to live-compile your code in a browser, or you can use the waul
precompiler to compile your code up-front. You can see the
live compiler in action by going to the caterwaul website. This site embeds a caterwaul compiler configured to use the standard macro library; this causes it to
compile what I refer to as the caterwaul programming language. The website documents this language in some detail, as does Caterwaul by
Example - though some of the examples will fail since Caterwaul 1.2.3, which introduces a breaking
change to the seq
library.
If you're interested in using caterwaul as a compiler library, I recommend reading the caterwaul reference manual, which covers its core API in significantly more detail than this readme. You can also read through the caterwaul source code, which contains copious documentation, some of which is up to date.
Caterwaul's Javascript parser takes anything with a valid toString()
method as input, including Javascript functions.
var tree = caterwaul.parse('3 + 4');
tree.toString() // '3 + 4'
tree.data // '+'
tree.length // 2
tree[0].data // '3'
tree[1].data // '4'
If you're serious about this stuff, I recommend writing this code in the caterwaul programming language. It supports a lot of advanced features that make syntax trees much easier to work with; in particular, preparsed quoted constructs (similar to the ' operator in Lisp). These will give you a significant performance advantage and better notation.
var pattern = caterwaul.parse('_x + _y');
var match = pattern.match(tree);
match._x.data // '3'
match._y.data // '4'
var template = caterwaul.parse('f(_x, _y)');
var new_tree = template.replace(match);
new_tree.toString() // 'f(3, 4)'
Caterwaul's compiler does a lot, but the basic case works like eval
:
var f = function (x, y) {return x * y};
caterwaul.compile(new_tree) // 12
You can also bind variables from the compiling environment:
var new_f = function (x, y) {return x + y};
caterwaul.compile(new_tree, {f: new_f}) // 7
You can only compile things that return values (technically, things which are expressions; the litmus test is whether you could legally wrap it in parentheses), so stuff like var x = 10
won't work. This is different from Javascript's eval
function. If you want to execute imperative code, you should wrap it in a function:
var function_wrapper = caterwaul.parse('(function() {_body})');
var code = caterwaul.parse('if (x) {console.log(x)}');
var new_function = caterwaul.compile(function_wrapper.replace({_body: code}));
new_function();
I wrote a set of macros that use the above API to modify Javascript code; this macro set has been refined over the past year to become a programming language that I find useful. You can learn this language on the caterwaul website, which goes through it by example and provides an interactive shell so you can see what the compilation process looks like.
There are two ways to use caterwaul as a programming language. You can compile code from inside another Javascript process, which works because all caterwaul code is syntactically valid
Javascript code as well (note that the following example will work only if you've loaded caterwaul.std.js
from the build/
directory):
var compiler = caterwaul(':all'); // :all means 'every macro you know about'
var compiled = compiler(function () {
console.log(x) -where [x = 10];
});
compiled(); // logs 10
The other way to use the programming language is by using the waul
precompiler. This compiles your code to straight Javascript, eliminating the runtime overhead imposed by caterwaul's
parser, macroexpander, and compiler. Waul files typically end in .waul
or .waul.sdoc
(if you're using SDoc, which waul will transparently
parse) and contain code like this:
caterwaul(':all')(function () {
n[10] *console.log -seq;
console.log('done #{message}')
-where [message = 'iterating through numbers'];
})();
You can compile this by running waul file.waul
, which will generate file.js
. file.js
may contain references to the caterwaul
global if you use certain macros, but there will be no
compilation overhead.
This is the coolest part of caterwaul in my opinion. Both caterwaul
as a Javascript object and waul
can give you string expressions that reproduce them. This is very useful for library
bundling; for example:
var r = caterwaul.replicator();
var code = r.toString();
If you do this, someone else can eval
'code' and they will end up with a global called caterwaul
that is configured exactly as your caterwaul
is configured. The only requirement is
that configurations be declared as modules, which is done like this:
// caterwaul.module(name, [compiler_configuration], function)
caterwaul.module('my-configuration', ':all', function ($) {
// $ is the global caterwaul object
$.foo = 'bar';
});
The output of replicator
is a function that recreates all modules by re-running their initializers. Note that replicator
rewrites the module functions into their post-compilation
equivalents; in other words, the body of each function has already been compiled into normal Javascript. This reduces total compilation overhead.
Suppose you write a custom caterwaul module and want a new version of waul
that contains it. You can ask waul
to replicate itself with an extension like this:
$ ./waul -r -e extension.waul > new-waul
$ chmod u+x new-waul
$ ./new-waul my-file.waul
This is especially useful for setting up shebang lines for scripts that require custom waul extensions:
#!./new-waul
caterwaul(':all')(function () {
// custom code
})();
The waul
in caterwaul's root directory is preloaded with build/caterwaul.std.js
and build/caterwaul.ui.js
. As you might guess, waul
wasn't written specially to contain these;
rather, it was generated by waul-core
(which doesn't have any libraries built-in) by this process:
$ ./waul-core --replicate -e build/caterwaul.std.min.js -e build/caterwaul.ui.min.js > waul
$ chmod 0700 waul