Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Optimize AppVeyor network stack for number of dynamic connections #922
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Optimize AppVeyor network stack for number of dynamic connections #922
Changes from 1 commit
2d735d2
4250798
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This setting requires this other key to be set or it will have no effect: (Source)
It also only takes effect after reboot, so if the AppVeyor VM reverts to base settings on each reboot this will also have no effect.
Third, both commands require Elevation. Does AppVeyor execute this as Admin? I find it unlikely.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, AppVeyor build VM is started fresh from image. So there is no point in setting this registry setting... do you know of any other method for setting wait delay that would be effective immediately?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Perhaps we can set the per-socket timeout when running the test Suite?
SO_REUSEPORT or SO_REUSEADDR seem to be more appropriate, but it looks like Windows doesn't really care about these flags.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Cool, this would work. But I think this amount of changes is beyond this PR and should be discussed further. For now I'll just remove the wait delay change as is is ineffective and leave the enlargement of client port pool in this PR.