Ignore __slotnames__ #2584
Merged
Ignore __slotnames__ #2584
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I have made things!
I noticed that we had a lot of
__slotnames__entries in our allow lists.I found that this is added by Python's pickling/copying machinery:
https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/5abff6960b4aecb0d5c81c7482cf3faa74e1983d/Lib/copyreg.py#L112-L161
https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/77d2fd441320ca365c34e21c475d3878f3d5d833/Objects/typeobject.c#L7036-L7083
It seems like it can be safely ignored.
I wondered if this attribute could be ignored by default in stubtest, or even added to
typeorobjectin typeshed (aslist[str]), but I am not sure how sensible that is. It doesn't always exist, only after a pickle.Related issues
n/a