Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
can: c_can: rename IF_RX -> IF_NAPI
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
The C_CAN/D_CAN cores implement 2 interfaces to manage the message
objects. To avoid concurrency and the need for locking one interface
is used in the TX path (IF_TX). While the other one, named IF_RX is
used from NAPI context only. As this interface is not only used to
manage RX, but also TX message objects, this patch renames IF_RX to
IF_NAPI.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Cc: Dario Binacchi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <[email protected]>
  • Loading branch information
marckleinebudde committed Aug 19, 2021
1 parent 236de85 commit 05cb2ba
Showing 1 changed file with 14 additions and 12 deletions.
26 changes: 14 additions & 12 deletions drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can_main.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -160,8 +160,8 @@

#define IF_MCONT_TX (IF_MCONT_TXIE | IF_MCONT_EOB)

/* Use IF1 for RX and IF2 for TX */
#define IF_RX 0
/* Use IF1 in NAPI path and IF2 in TX path */
#define IF_NAPI 0
#define IF_TX 1

/* minimum timeout for checking BUSY status */
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -529,13 +529,13 @@ static void c_can_configure_msg_objects(struct net_device *dev)

/* first invalidate all message objects */
for (i = priv->msg_obj_rx_first; i <= priv->msg_obj_num; i++)
c_can_inval_msg_object(dev, IF_RX, i);
c_can_inval_msg_object(dev, IF_NAPI, i);

/* setup receive message objects */
for (i = priv->msg_obj_rx_first; i < priv->msg_obj_rx_last; i++)
c_can_setup_receive_object(dev, IF_RX, i, 0, 0, IF_MCONT_RCV);
c_can_setup_receive_object(dev, IF_NAPI, i, 0, 0, IF_MCONT_RCV);

c_can_setup_receive_object(dev, IF_RX, priv->msg_obj_rx_last, 0, 0,
c_can_setup_receive_object(dev, IF_NAPI, priv->msg_obj_rx_last, 0, 0,
IF_MCONT_RCV_EOB);
}

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -710,11 +710,11 @@ static void c_can_do_tx(struct net_device *dev)
pend &= ~BIT(idx);
obj = idx + priv->msg_obj_tx_first;

/* We use IF_RX interface instead of IF_TX because we
/* We use IF_NAPI interface instead of IF_TX because we
* are called from c_can_poll(), which runs inside
* NAPI. We are not transmitting.
*/
c_can_inval_tx_object(dev, IF_RX, obj);
c_can_inval_tx_object(dev, IF_NAPI, obj);
can_get_echo_skb(dev, idx, NULL);
bytes += priv->dlc[idx];
pkts++;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -766,14 +766,14 @@ static u32 c_can_adjust_pending(u32 pend, u32 rx_mask)
static inline void c_can_rx_object_get(struct net_device *dev,
struct c_can_priv *priv, u32 obj)
{
c_can_object_get(dev, IF_RX, obj, priv->comm_rcv_high);
c_can_object_get(dev, IF_NAPI, obj, priv->comm_rcv_high);
}

static inline void c_can_rx_finalize(struct net_device *dev,
struct c_can_priv *priv, u32 obj)
{
if (priv->type != BOSCH_D_CAN)
c_can_object_get(dev, IF_RX, obj, IF_COMM_CLR_NEWDAT);
c_can_object_get(dev, IF_NAPI, obj, IF_COMM_CLR_NEWDAT);
}

static int c_can_read_objects(struct net_device *dev, struct c_can_priv *priv,
Expand All @@ -785,10 +785,12 @@ static int c_can_read_objects(struct net_device *dev, struct c_can_priv *priv,
pend &= ~BIT(obj - 1);

c_can_rx_object_get(dev, priv, obj);
ctrl = priv->read_reg(priv, C_CAN_IFACE(MSGCTRL_REG, IF_RX));
ctrl = priv->read_reg(priv, C_CAN_IFACE(MSGCTRL_REG, IF_NAPI));

if (ctrl & IF_MCONT_MSGLST) {
int n = c_can_handle_lost_msg_obj(dev, IF_RX, obj, ctrl);
int n;

n = c_can_handle_lost_msg_obj(dev, IF_NAPI, obj, ctrl);

pkts += n;
quota -= n;
Expand All @@ -803,7 +805,7 @@ static int c_can_read_objects(struct net_device *dev, struct c_can_priv *priv,
continue;

/* read the data from the message object */
c_can_read_msg_object(dev, IF_RX, ctrl);
c_can_read_msg_object(dev, IF_NAPI, ctrl);

c_can_rx_finalize(dev, priv, obj);

Expand Down

0 comments on commit 05cb2ba

Please sign in to comment.