epoll: move eavail next to the list_empty_careful check

This is a no-op change and simply to make the code more coherent. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <[email protected]> Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Khazhismel Kumykov <[email protected]> Cc: Guantao Liu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
vieko · Dec 19, 2020 · e411596 · e411596
1 parent cccd29b
commit e411596
Showing 1 changed file with 1 addition and 2 deletions.
diff --git a/fs/eventpoll.c b/fs/eventpoll.c
@@ -1828,6 +1828,7 @@ static int ep_poll(struct eventpoll *ep, struct epoll_event __user *events,
 		if (!eavail)
 			timed_out = !schedule_hrtimeout_range(to, slack,
 							      HRTIMER_MODE_ABS);
+		__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
 
 		/*
 		 * We were woken up, thus go and try to harvest some events.
@@ -1837,8 +1838,6 @@ static int ep_poll(struct eventpoll *ep, struct epoll_event __user *events,
 		eavail = 1;
 	} while (0);
 
-	__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
-
 	if (!list_empty_careful(&wait.entry)) {
 		write_lock_irq(&ep->lock);
 		/*