Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Develop #444

Closed
wants to merge 18 commits into from
Closed

Develop #444

wants to merge 18 commits into from

Conversation

RolandoTonin
Copy link

I use the xbim library to model checking tests in a few my apps of my road infrastructure design company (internal use). I ask you if they are included (foreseen) in your roadmap and, if plannig, when:

  1. compatibility with the recent IFC 4.3 version published by BuildingSmart
  2. compatibility of the code and of the WPF viewer with .NET 6 and later versions
  3. compatibility of your WEB Viewer with Blazor platform

thanks a lot for your great work
Rolando Tonin

@martin1cerny
Copy link
Member

Hi @RolandoTonin, thank you for the contribution. Yes, we actually have great plans which include these:

  1. New IFC4.3 schema: We plan to have it implemented in the next couple of weeks in XbimEssentials. In parallel, we will be evaluating necessary changes in Xbim.Geometry
  2. Yes, we plan to support .NET6
  3. You should already be able to use our web viewer in Blazor web applications.

Ibrahim5aad and others added 15 commits October 20, 2022 08:52
…m cell elements getters to avoid reading unintitalized backing fields
…g interface types

when using and esent model provider the count of method of the persisted cache throws exception when counting interface types because the implementation supported only getting the corresponding express types of classes
[CHANGED] Slightly change the  "ProjectUnits" to add imperial in the enum and use SetOrChangeSiUnit to simplify the reading in IfcProject Initialize process
…sion double values with g17 spec. in Part21FormatterTests
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants