Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Update README.md
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
daijifeng001 authored Nov 9, 2016
1 parent 3509ad4 commit aa6367d
Showing 1 changed file with 4 additions and 4 deletions.
8 changes: 4 additions & 4 deletions README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -8,11 +8,11 @@ py-R-FCN now supports both joint training and alternative optimization.
The official R-FCN code (written in MATLAB) is available [here](https://github.com/daijifeng001/R-FCN).
If your goal is to reproduce the results in the [NIPS 2016 paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.06409), please use the [official code](https://github.com/daijifeng001/R-FCN).

py-R-FCN is based on the [py-faster-rcnn code](https://github.com/rbgirshick/py-faster-rcnn )(include this README) and [the offcial R-FCN implementation](https://github.com/daijifeng001/R-FCN), and the usage is quite similar to [py-faster-rcnn](https://github.com/rbgirshick/py-faster-rcnn ), thanks for their great works.
py-R-FCN is modified from [py-faster-rcnn code](https://github.com/rbgirshick/py-faster-rcnn )(include this README) and [the offcial R-FCN implementation](https://github.com/daijifeng001/R-FCN), and the usage is quite similar to [py-faster-rcnn](https://github.com/rbgirshick/py-faster-rcnn ).

There are slight differences between the two implementations.
In particular, this Python port
- is ~10% slower at test-time, because some operations execute on the CPU in Python layers (e.g., 90ms / image vs. 99ms / image for ResNet-50)
There are slight differences between py-R-FCN and the official R-FCN implementation.
- py-R-FCN is ~10% slower at test-time, because some operations execute on the CPU in Python layers (e.g., 90ms / image vs. 99ms / image for ResNet-50)
- py-R-FCN supports both join training and alternative optimization of R-FCN.

#### Some modification

Expand Down

0 comments on commit aa6367d

Please sign in to comment.